Results dashboard
Placeholder data shown for illustration. Aggregate others-impression is based on 7 colleague responses; individual responses are never displayed, and others-impression results are only shown when at least 3 colleagues have responded.
Reports are matched by the focal person selected at the start of each form.
The overall score predicts how likely people are to “tell the emperor they’ve got no clothes.” Higher scores across Invitation, Permission, Curiosity and Response mean colleagues are more willing to share challenging or dissenting information upward.
Self-impression · average 4.0
Likely
People are generally willing to share critical upward feedback, though some situations may still inhibit it.
Others-impression · average 3.5
Likely
People are generally willing to share critical upward feedback, though some situations may still inhibit it.
| Construct | Self | Others (aggregate) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invitation | 4.3 | 3.4 | +0.9self rates higher |
| Permission | 3.7 | 2.9 | +0.8self rates higher |
| Curiosity | 4.6 | 4.1 | +0.5self rates higher |
| Response | 3.2 | 3.8 | -0.6others rate higher |
Shown where the gap between self-impression and aggregate others-impression is 0.5 points or more. Actions are illustrative and should be explored with a coach or facilitator.